Click here to read Here & Now (Pt. 1): Is Immediate Ride Boarding For Autistic Guests Really Necessary?
Click here for Here & Now (Pt. 2): Is Immediate, On-Demand Ride Access For Autistic Guests Reasonable?
Click here for Here & Now (Pt. 3): Isn't Standing In Line An Essential Rule Of The Park ... Even For Autistic Guests?
Click here for Here & Now (Pt. 2): Is Immediate, On-Demand Ride Access For Autistic Guests Reasonable?
Click here for Here & Now (Pt. 3): Isn't Standing In Line An Essential Rule Of The Park ... Even For Autistic Guests?
I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that the issue of
autistic guests and, more specifically, what services must be extended to
autistic guests under the Americans With Disability Act, is one of the hottest
topics in the amusement industry today.
To illustrate, I spoke about the Americans With Disabilities Act at an
amusement industry event in Las Vegas in February and, while my comments were not directed
at the legal requirements surrounding autism specifically, virtually all the
questions from the attendees were. I spent
a good portion of two days talking, in one way or another, about one repeated question: Does an amusement park have a legal
obligation to allow autistic guests (and, by extension, their families)
immediate boarding on rides? It’s a
question with very little answer in the existing law.
Well, that may be changing.
As many of you undoubtedly know, a recent lawsuit against Disney called A.L. v. Walt Disney Parks & Resorts US,Inc., has put this question directly to a federal court in California. It’s a first-of-its-kind lawsuit against an
amusement park operator with the know-how and resources to litigate this issue
to a ruling. It’s a case the entire amusement
industry needs to watch, and an issue that is very worthy of some discussion –
particularly as we approach summer and the height of the amusement industry’s
operating season.
Now, before I go further and before I am accused of
insensitivity to the autistic community, there is a critically important point
to make. There is a difference between
legal requirements on the one hand and guest service on the other. I am concerned only with the former. That is to say, whether a park may choose
to extend immediate boarding privileges to disabled guests, and more
specifically autistic guests, in the interest of providing a service is not the
question at hand. There is obviously no
legal impediment to such an offering. But that’s an entirely different question
from whether the ADA legally requires amusement operators to allow autistic guests to skip lines. And that is the only question that concerns
me for the time being.
Nor is this piece
going to pick apart the specifics of the access policy at issue in the Walt
Disney case. I’ve already done that in a prior piece. For now, it’s enough to
know the following:
1. Before October
2013, Disney had a system at its theme parks that allowed guests with disabilities
to bypass the line and board rides immediately.
For obvious reasons, this was a very popular program.
2. Starting in
October 2013, Disney changed its policy to, as relevant here, require guests
who, due to a disability, cannot wait in line to obtain an “appointment” for a
ride. The appointment time corresponded
to the length of the line. The upshot
here being that, even if a guest cannot wait in the line, that guest
must nonetheless wait before being allowed to ride. Guests cannot “stack” ride appointments
either, so it is generally not possible to set up back-to-back appointments
such that a disabled guest waits for the first ride of the day, but none
thereafter.
3. Guests who do not
believe that Disney’s policy adequately addresses their particular needs may
discuss the matter with Guest Relations to determine if another reasonable
accommodation can be made.
The Complaint filed in the Disney action, all 176 pages of it, alleges a litany of issues with the new program, including inconsistent
enforcement and service issues at Guest Relations, insensitive employee
communication with disabled guests, and claims that the policy inflicts
emotional distress on parents faced with a “meltdown” (the exact word used in
the complaint, repeatedly) by their autistic children. It even goes so far as to allege that the
policy is the result of an intentional
effort to keep autistic children out
of Disney parks so as not to impair the “Disney Magic” for other guests. While, uhhhh, interesting, I’m not going to
get into these issues too much here because, at bottom, what the plaintiffs in
the Disney case want is immediate boarding on rides. That’s the million dollar issue.
So let’s get into it:
Does the ADA require parks to give immediate boarding access to
autistic guests? This is a complicated
issue that raises, to my mind, three questions:
1. Is immediate boarding necessary,
in the legal sense, for autistic guests at amusement parks? While what little case law exists seems to
largely gloss over this question, probably due to a concern about appearing
insensitive, I think it is a legitimate question to ask in light of the unique
place the amusement industry appears to have with respect to autistic guests
and waiting?
2. Is an appointment system, as
opposed to immediate boarding, unreasonable with respect to autistic
guests? This is the central
focus of the Disney complaint and the one that the Court will have to struggle
with. Luckily, in the cruise ship
context, one court already has.
3. Doesn’t eliminating lines
fundamentally alter the services an amusement park provides to its guests? Put another way, isn’t waiting in line an
integral part of the amusement park experience (albeit not one that most people
enjoy) such that eliminating it results in a wholly different guest
experience?
Because each of these questions raises interesting and
important issues in their own right, I’m going to take a page from my recent Blackfish / White Lies series and
proceed in multiple parts – one devoted to each of these questions. So…for now, I leave you with a (hopefully)
whetted appetite.
Click here to read Here & Now (Pt. 1): Is Immediate Ride Boarding For Autistic Guests Really Necessary?
Click here for Here & Now (Pt. 2): Is Immediate, On-Demand Ride Access For Autistic Guests Reasonable?
Click here for Here & Now (Pt. 3): Isn't Standing In Line An Essential Rule Of The Park ... Even For Autistic Guests?
Click here for Here & Now (Pt. 2): Is Immediate, On-Demand Ride Access For Autistic Guests Reasonable?
Click here for Here & Now (Pt. 3): Isn't Standing In Line An Essential Rule Of The Park ... Even For Autistic Guests?
Can't wait!! We deal with this all the time with Section 504 accommodations etc. in education. It will be interesting to see how the amusement industry will have to deal with this issue and what your "take" is on this.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often. Click Here
ReplyDeleteAn impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little analysis on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast because I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic.
ReplyDeletepopcorn time download
I like this post,And I guess that they having fun to read this post,they shall take a good site to make a information,thanks for sharing it to me. gpwlaw-wv.com/
ReplyDeleteI’ll grade this blog as an A and it shows how much effort has been put into this.
ReplyDeletecollections harassment
In the face of global economic challenges coupled with the increasing loss of American jobs why would a U.S. law firm want to even consider legal outsourcing? Are there valid reasons why targeted legal outsourcing should be considered by every U.S. law firm?Brian Holm Attorney San Diego
ReplyDeleteLaw firm promoting do sites and all the more publicizing system of core values that are joined into the specialized data with our profound learning of business affirmed. go here
ReplyDelete