Julie Mills, an attorney and blogger who writes about ADA issues in the hospitality industry, wrote a piece this week on HR 203 - a new bill that has been introduced in Congress that, if passed, would permit pools to use temporary lifts instead of incurring the expense and potential safety issues that arise from the ADA's current requirement for fixed lifts in most pools. Julie does a nice job of summing up the issue so, with her permission, I've reprinted her piece below. Julie's Blog, "The ADA: Titles II and III," can be found here.
(read her piece and my thoughts after the jump)
Pages
▼
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Happy New Year From The California Supreme Court! A Home Run Ruling In Nalwa v. Cedar Fair
In the law, there aren’t many things that can rightfully be
called a home run. The vast majority of “big”
decisions out there are not total wins for one side, but are judged to be “big”
because, in the main, their result effects a shift in the law or undoes a prior
bad result even while, in some modest measure, containing a small victory for
the “loser.” The recent Supreme Court
Obama-care decision is a perfect illustration: the Court upheld the individual
mandate (the big win for liberals all over the country) while making clear that
the individual mandate is, in reality, a tax (a small victory for
conservatives). On New Year’s Eve,
though, the California Supreme Court issued a rare home run opinion in Nalwa
v. Cedar Fair – an opinion that eviscerates the prior poorly-reasoned decision
of the California Court of Appeals and unambiguously establishes the right of
amusement and recreation facilities to assert the primary assumption of the
risk defense to avoid costly and uncertain trial practice. Even more remarkable, although the decision
was a 6-1 majority (a strong victory to be sure), the Court of Appeals
reasoning – that California’s public policy precludes the applicability of the
assumption of the risk doctrine to the recreation industry entirely – was unanimously rejected. There is simply no way to view this decision as
anything but a complete home run for both Cedar Fair and the amusement industry
in general.